Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHamdhani, Hamdhani
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T07:13:30Z
dc.date.available2021-11-25T07:13:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-17
dc.identifier.citationEppehimer, D. E., Hamdhani, H., Hollien, K. D., Nemec, Z. C., Lee, L. N., Quanrud, D. M., & Bogan, M. T. (2021). Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-15.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1614-7499
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/7646
dc.descriptionhttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=23918&tip=sid&clean=0 Jurnal Q2en_US
dc.description.abstractEffluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants can be a substantial source of microplastics in receiving water bodies including rivers. Despite growing concern about microplastic pollution in freshwater habitats, the literature has not yet addressed effluent-dependent rivers, which derive 100% of their baseflow from effluent. The objective of this study was to document and explore trends in microplastic pollution within the effluent-dependent lower Santa Cruz River near Tucson, Arizona (USA). We examined microplastic concentrations in the water column and benthic sediment and microplastic consumption by mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) at 10 sites along a ~40 km stretch of the lower Santa Cruz River across two time periods: baseflow (effluent only) and post-flood (effluent immediately following urban runoff). In total, across both sampling periods, we detected microplastics in 95% of water column samples, 99% of sediment samples, and 6% of mosquitofish stomachs. Flow status (baseflow vs post-flood) was the only significant predictor of microplastic presence and concentrations in our models. Microplastic fragment concentrations in the water column were higher post-flood, microplastic fiber concentrations in benthic sediment were lower post-flood, and mosquitofish were more likely to have consumed microplastics post-flood than during baseflow. The additional microplastics detected after flooding was likely due to a combination of allochthonous material entering the channel via runoff and bed scour that exhumed microplastics previously buried in the riverbed. Effluent-dependent urban streams are becoming increasingly common; more work is needed to identify microplastic pollution baselines and trends in effluent rivers worldwideen_US
dc.description.sponsorship--en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer: Environmental Science and Pollution Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries28:45375–45389;28
dc.subjectWastewater . Plastic . Sediment . Water column . Fish . Flood . Urban ecologyen_US
dc.titleTurnitin: Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USAen_US
dc.title.alternativeImpacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record