| dc.contributor.advisor | | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rayadin, Yaya | |
| dc.contributor.author | Buřivalov a, Zuzana | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-21T07:54:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-21T07:54:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-11-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Rayadin, Y., & Buřivalov a, Z. (2021). What does it take to have a mutually beneficial research collaboration across countries? Conservation Science and Practice, e528. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.528 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2578-4854 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/17733 | |
| dc.description | Funding agencies have the leverage to incentivize more
balanced collaborations, such as by prioritizing applications
with local researchers as co-investigators and principal
investigators, providing additional funding for
international students, and awarding small grants specifically
aimed at starting equitable research partnerships.
Universities can revise admission criteria to not exclude
candidates from low and middle income countries, such
as by not considering the GREs. Fundamentally, however,
we believe that building an equitable, mutually beneficial,
lasting, and satisfying partnership depends on the
4 of 5 RAYADIN AND BUŘIVALOV A
will and intention of individual scientists: particularly,
foreign researchers in danger of doing “parachute science”
have to acknowledge the power imbalance in their
favour, and whatever prejudice and bias comes with or
before that, and host country researchers have to demand
transparency and inclusion in the funding and publication
process. Then, both parties together have to take
active steps towards establishing effective communication,
and support each other to work with and in spite of
history and current institutional conditions. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | We reflect on the challenges researchers face when working in multi-national
collaborations in conservation science, whereby the researchers' countries are
unequal in terms of financial and institutional support or other factors that
contribute to a power imbalance. Based on our personal experiences and challenges,
we outline four key aspects of the research cycle that provide opportunities
to build or strengthen more equitable research partnerships: defining
the shared research agenda, obtaining funding, publication, and the
connecting thread of effective communication. We give recommendations for
both the visiting scientist and the local scientist hosting international collaborators,
as well as for institutions involved in conservation science. We hope
that our perspectives can help other conservation scientists achieve productive
and mutually beneficial collaborations that can lead to positive conservation
outcomes. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/csp2.528 | en_US |
| dc.subject | communication, conservation research sites, equitable research, guest and ghost authors, parachute science, power imbalance | en_US |
| dc.title | What does it take to have a mutually beneficial research collaboration across countries? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
