Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/3694
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSpehar, Stephanie N.
dc.contributor.authorLoken, Brent
dc.contributor.authorRayadin, Yaya
dc.contributor.authorRoyle, J. Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-06T03:33:29Z
dc.date.available2020-02-06T03:33:29Z
dc.date.issued2015-11
dc.identifier.citationSpehar, N. S., Loken, B., Rayadin, Y., & Royle, A. J. (2015). Comparing spatial capture–recapture modeling and nest count methods to estimate orangutan densities in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biological Conservation 191 (2015) 185–193en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.013
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/3694
dc.description.abstractAccurate information on the density and abundance of animal populations is essential for understanding species' ecology and for conservation planning, but is difficult to obtain. The endangered orangutan (Pongo spp.) is an example; due to its elusive behavior and low densities, researchers have relied on methods that convert nest counts to orangutan densities and require substantial effort for reliable results. Camera trapping and spatial capture–recapture (SCR) models could provide an alternative but have not been used for primates.Wecompared density estimates calculated using the two methods for orangutans in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Camera trapping/SCR modeling produced a density estimate of 0.16 ± 0.09–0.29 indiv/km2, and nest counts produced a density estimate of 1.05 ± 0.18–6.01 indiv/km2. The large confidence interval of the nest count estimate is probably due to high variance in nest encounter rates, indicating the need for larger sample size and the substantial effort required to produce reliable results using this method. The SCR estimate produced a very low density estimate and had a narrower but still fairly wide confidence interval. This was likely due to unmodeled heterogeneity and small sample size, specifically a lownumber of individual captures and recaptures. We propose methodological fixes that could address these issues and improve precision. A comparison of the overall costs and benefits of the two methods suggests that camera trapping/SCR modeling can potentially be a useful tool for assessing the densities of orangutans and other elusive primates, and warrant further investigation to determine broad applicability and methodological adjustments needed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBiological Conservation 191 (2015) 185–193en_US
dc.subjectPongo pygmaeus morio, Population density, Camera trapping, Spatial capture–recapture models, Nest surveysen_US
dc.titleComparing spatial capture–recapture modeling and nest count methods to estimate orangutan densities in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:J - Forestry

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
8. Comparing spatial capture–recapture modeling and nest count methods to estimate orangutan densities in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.pdfComparing spatial capture–recapture modeling and nest count methods to estimate orangutan densities in the Wehea Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.