Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/17733Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | ||
| dc.contributor.author | Rayadin, Yaya | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Buřivalov a, Zuzana | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-21T07:54:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-21T07:54:20Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-11-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Rayadin, Y., & Buřivalov a, Z. (2021). What does it take to have a mutually beneficial research collaboration across countries? Conservation Science and Practice, e528. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.528 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2578-4854 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/17733 | - |
| dc.description | Funding agencies have the leverage to incentivize more balanced collaborations, such as by prioritizing applications with local researchers as co-investigators and principal investigators, providing additional funding for international students, and awarding small grants specifically aimed at starting equitable research partnerships. Universities can revise admission criteria to not exclude candidates from low and middle income countries, such as by not considering the GREs. Fundamentally, however, we believe that building an equitable, mutually beneficial, lasting, and satisfying partnership depends on the 4 of 5 RAYADIN AND BUŘIVALOV A will and intention of individual scientists: particularly, foreign researchers in danger of doing “parachute science” have to acknowledge the power imbalance in their favour, and whatever prejudice and bias comes with or before that, and host country researchers have to demand transparency and inclusion in the funding and publication process. Then, both parties together have to take active steps towards establishing effective communication, and support each other to work with and in spite of history and current institutional conditions. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | We reflect on the challenges researchers face when working in multi-national collaborations in conservation science, whereby the researchers' countries are unequal in terms of financial and institutional support or other factors that contribute to a power imbalance. Based on our personal experiences and challenges, we outline four key aspects of the research cycle that provide opportunities to build or strengthen more equitable research partnerships: defining the shared research agenda, obtaining funding, publication, and the connecting thread of effective communication. We give recommendations for both the visiting scientist and the local scientist hosting international collaborators, as well as for institutions involved in conservation science. We hope that our perspectives can help other conservation scientists achieve productive and mutually beneficial collaborations that can lead to positive conservation outcomes. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/csp2.528 | en_US |
| dc.subject | communication, conservation research sites, equitable research, guest and ghost authors, parachute science, power imbalance | en_US |
| dc.title | What does it take to have a mutually beneficial research collaboration across countries? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | A - Forestry | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artikel, Journal International, Research collaboration.pdf | Main Article | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.