| dc.contributor.author | Ramadiani, Ramadiani | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-08T14:46:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-01-08T14:46:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ramadiani, 2012. SOFTWARE QUALITY MEASUREMEN AND METRICS (REVIEW SOME ARTICLES), Jurnal Informatika Mulawarman Vol. 7 No. 3 Edisi September 2012 82-87 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | ISSN 1858-4853 (Print) | ISSN 2597-4963 (Online) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JIM/article/view/98/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/3517 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Software development processes have less variability than the projects or products upon which they are applied, a feature that has provided the source for considerable debate on how to capture and describe software processes for the purposes of understanding or inclusion within Software Engineering Environments.The software measurement is potentially very diverse in nature, thereare four basic stages of formulation, collection, analysis and interpretationThesuccessful measurement programmes must support the collection of cost, duration and quality values. There are some varian measurementmetrics such as;performance analysis, deliverable analyses, quality objectives, schedule analyses, effort analyses etc. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Published by: Mulawarman University Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Informatika Mulawarman (JIM) | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jim.v7i3.98; | |
| dc.subject | Software Quality, Measurement, Matric | en_US |
| dc.title | SOFTWARE QUALITY MEASUREMEN AND METRICS (REVIEW SOME ARTICLES) | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
