| dc.contributor.author | rosmini, rosmini | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-18T00:53:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-18T00:53:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-12-31 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/13502 | |
| dc.description | Sistem impeachment di Negara Jerman diterapkan sedikit berbeda dengan yang diterapkan di Indonesia. Sistem impeachment di Negara Jerman dieksekusi oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi yang putusannya bersifat final, yang artinya tidaklah mendapat usulan 2/3 dari Bundestag dan Bundestraat terkait pemberhentian Presiden dan Wakil Presiden layaknya di Indonesia. Pengaturan sistem impeachment di sebuah negara perlu dikaji dengan melibatkan negara pembanding untuk mengetahui apakah sistem impeachment di sebuah negara berjalan secara optimal dan ideal. Perbandingan Impeachment antara Indonesia dan Jerman, mekanisme pemberhentian presiden yang diatur dalam konstitusi adalah penegasan bahwa Republik Indonesia adalah negara hukum, ini adalah suatu langkah maju dalam perspektif ketatanegaraan agar pemakzulan presiden yang didasari faktor non yuridis semata tak terjadi kembali dimasa yang akan datang, Dalam mekanisme pemberhentian presiden sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, karena dalam mekanisme impeachment, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang membenarkan pendapat DPR tidak bersifat mengikat. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The impeachment system in Germany is implemented slightly differently from that applied in Indonesia.
The impeachment system in Germany is executed by the Constitutional Court whose decision is final, which
means that it does not receive a 2/3 proposal from the Bundestag and the Bundestraat regarding the
dismissal of the President and Vice President as in Indonesia. The regulation of the impeachment system
in a country needs to be studied by involving a comparison country to find out whether the impeachment
system in a country runs optimally and ideally. Comparison of Impeachment between Indonesia and
Germany, The mechanism for dismissing the president as regulated in the constitution is an affirmation
that the Republic of Indonesia is a state of law, this is a step forward in a constitutional perspective so that
impeachment of the president based on non-juridical factors alone does not happen again in the future.
dismissal of the president as regulated in the 1945 Constitution, because in the impeachment mechanism,
the decision of the Constitutional Court confirming the opinion of the DPR is not binding. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda | en_US |
| dc.subject | president impeachment; constitutional law; comparative law | en_US |
| dc.title | Perbandingan Konstitusional Pengaturan Impeachment Presiden Antara Indonesia Dengan Jerman | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
