Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaharani, Septya
dc.contributor.authorRidwanto, Holis
dc.contributor.authorHatta, Heliza Rahmania
dc.contributor.authorkhairina, Dyna Marisa
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Muhammad Rivani
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-17T05:42:53Z
dc.date.available2022-01-17T05:42:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.identifier.issn2252-8938
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/12087
dc.description.abstractHouse renovation is given by the government to the community, one of which is the assistance provided in the district. Long Mevery especially Tanah Abang Village, namely House Renovation Assistance. So, it is necessary to implement a DSS in determining the recipient of home renovation assistance by comparing multi-atribute utility theory (MAUT) method and TOPSIS to assist the government in determining the right home renovation assistance recipient. There are 16 criteria and their weight values. This study uses the multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) method and the order of preference technique based on the similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) as a calculation method to produce output and determine the level of accuracy of each method. The test in this study uses a confusion matrix and compares real data testing with the results of calculations on the system. The results of system testing using MAUT and TOPSIS methods, the accuracy of the MAUT method is 94.28% and the TOPSIS method is 35.71%.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIAES Institute of Advanced Engineering and Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence;4
dc.subjectconfusion matrixen_US
dc.subjectDecision Support Systemen_US
dc.subjectHome Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectMAUTen_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.titleComparison of TOPSIS and MAUT methods for recipient determination home surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record